Purchased from/price: Meijer, $3 each (x20)
Packs/cards: 20 packs / 20 cards (generally 11 base, 4 Prospects/WBC, 3 Chrome Prospects/WBC, 2 WasteACard Gold Parallels)
Set size: 220 base cards, 90 Prospects, 20 WBC Prospects (ditto on the Chrome versions of Prospects and WBC)
Key features: Lots of rookies/first year cards; autographs; Chrome!
Key cards: Aroldis Chapman WBC, plus lots of other base RCs (none of which is worth a ton at the moment, but it's only been a year)
Fronts: base, base RC, Prospect, WBC Prospect, Chrome Prospect, Chrome WBC Prospect |
Backs (same order) |
Set completion:
- Base: 147/220 (67%)
- Prospects: 52/90 (58%)
- WBC Prospects: 10/20 (50%)
- Chrome Prospects: 38/90 (42%)
- Chrome WBC Prospects: 11/20 (55%)
- Base: 57 doubles, 13 triples 3 quadruples(!)
- Prospects: 10 doubles, 3 triples, 2 quadruples(!)
- WBC: 2 doubles, 1 triple(!)
- Chrome Prospects: 5
- Chrome WBC Prospects: 1
3 XFractors, 2 Refractors, 1 stupid Gold... |
...AND A STUPID SCOUT AUTOGRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPH! |
Inserts:
- Gold Parallel that is a total waste of one or more cards: 40 total, 39 different (two of Pujols), 4 Prospects and 1 WBC (2:1, 40 expected, but certainly not wanted)
- Refractor (#d to 599): Luis Jimenez Prospects, Jarred Bogany Prospects (1:8, 2-3 expected)
- XFractor (#d to 299): Kyeong Kang Prospects, Jon Mark Owings Prospects, Nino Leyja Prospects (1:15, 1-2 expected)
Relics: None (none expected)
Best pack: #12 included the Aroldis Chapman WBC card (see next item) and Nino Leyja Xfractor (see above). By Beckett value alone this pack is great (and worth $20+) but more importantly, those are two sweet cards
Best card: (In an effort to be more positive in these reviews (other than the actual review part below), I'm getting rid of "worst pack" and replacing it with this category):
Yeah, I'm going with the Chapman WBC card. He's hot right now and anyway, this is a great looking card
Quality control: 5/10 I ended up with a LOT of dinged cards. As always (and this is no surprise, Topps), black cards are more prone to chipping, so maybe we shouldn't use it so much, guys?
Collation: 6/10 I'm sorry, this is WAAAAAAAY too many triples and quads, even for a random assortment of packs. It's even harder to believe I pulled so many extras of the Chromes and WBCs since there are fewer. I bumped this up because I beat the odds on all my inserts (three XFractors!) and even that "autograph"
Value: 5/10 Compared to what they used to cost, these packs were at a pretty decent price (especially considering you're getting twice as many cards as you usually do for your $3). Still, these aren't worth a lot yet since most of the guys are unproven or unknown. I didn't pull many big-ticket cards besides the Chapman and inserts, and if I haven't mentioned it yet, that autograph is a piece of crap. Jeez, at least get Matt Holliday's John Hancock on the thing to make it an interesting insert
Set design and player selection: 7/10 baseline of 5; +1 for good photography, +1 for Chrome, +1 for Refractors, +1 for XFractors, +1 for generally good player selection, +1 for lots of rookies, +1 for WBC; -1 for chipping-prone black, -1 for illegible font on numbers, -1 for numbering cards with letters in front (ie BCP-11) which also makes them hard to read, -1 for only one year of stats plus career totals, -1 for 800 combinations of sets and parallels
Inserts and extras: 4/10 If not for the WBC cards, Refractors and XFractors (and the low but conceivable possibility of actual player autographs) I'd give this a 1. God damn is that scout autograph stupid. No offense, Pat Daugherty, but not even somebody in your family would give me a buck for your signature on a sticker
Overall score: 27/50
Ok, let's review my reaction to pulling that "autograph" from the last pack (compounded by the numerous triples and quads) internet meme and YouTube video style:
Yeah, that's a start anyway. What's even more ridiculous is that Mojo had the very same thing happen to him recently! I don't just mean he pulled one of the same autograph set, but the very same card! Think I'm going overboard? IT'S A GODDAM SCOUT AUTOGRAPH! It's not a player, it's some schlub that was involved in drafting him. Not the guy that actually drafted him of course, just a guy that watched him play and thought, "Gee, that Matt Holliday seems to be pretty good." No offense to scouts, it's a tough job, but I bet even they wouldn't want each others' autographs. Also, really, a sticker? The guy couldn't be bothered to sign an actual card? FAIL, Topps, FAIL.
Anyway, aside from the horrendously bad autograph, I'll be combining what I pulled with whatever I already had (as soon as I can figure out where I stashed those piles) and putting together wantlists, so keep an eye out for those soon. In the meantime, don't bother picking up more than a couple of these rack packs (which I normally ordinarily enjoy), you'll be disappointed
Im LMAO
ReplyDeleteSorry man...
Hey look at it on the bright side Its was worth a great chuckle on my end.
Great montage as well.
ReplyDelete2009 was not a great year for Bowman
ReplyDeleteFabulous montage, especially the Clue reference at the end. I had a roommate in college who tried to work the flames on the side of my face quote into every single conversation ever. Surprisingly it never got old.
ReplyDelete